Path With Minimum Effort
Time O(m * n * log(m * n)) · Space O(m * n) · Official statement on LeetCode
Solutions
// Time: O(m * n * log(m * n))
// Space: O(m * n)
// Dijkstra algorithm solution
class Solution {
public:
int minimumEffortPath(vector<vector<int>>& heights) {
static const vector<pair<int, int>> directions{{0, 1}, {1, 0},
{0, -1}, {-1, 0}};
using T = tuple<int, int, int>;
vector<vector<int>> dist(size(heights), vector<int>(size(heights[0]), numeric_limits<int>::max()));
dist[0][0] = 0;
priority_queue<T, vector<T>, greater<T>> min_heap;
min_heap.emplace(0, 0, 0);
vector<vector<int>> lookup(size(heights), vector<int>(size(heights[0])));
while (!empty(min_heap)) {
const auto [d, r, c] = min_heap.top(); min_heap.pop();
if (lookup[r][c]) {
continue;
}
lookup[r][c] = true;
if (r == size(heights) - 1 && c == size(heights[0]) - 1) {
return d;
}
for (const auto& [dr, dc] : directions) {
int nr = r + dr, nc = c + dc;
if (!(0 <= nr && nr < size(heights) &&
0 <= nc && nc < size(heights[0]) &&
!lookup[nr][nc])) {
continue;
}
int nd = max(d, abs(heights[nr][nc] - heights[r][c]));
if (nd < dist[nr][nc]) {
dist[nr][nc] = nd;
min_heap.emplace(nd, nr, nc);
}
}
}
return -1;
}
};
// Time: O(m * n * log(m * n) + m * n * α(m * n)) = O(m * n * log(m * n))
// Space: O(m * n)
// union find solution
class Solution2 {
public:
int minimumEffortPath(vector<vector<int>>& heights) {
vector<tuple<int, int, int>> diffs;
for (int i = 0; i < size(heights); ++i) {
for (int j = 0; j < size(heights[0]); ++j) {
if (i > 0) {
diffs.emplace_back(abs(heights[i][j] - heights[i - 1][j]),
index(size(heights[0]), i - 1, j),
index(size(heights[0]), i, j));
}
if (j > 0) {
diffs.emplace_back(abs(heights[i][j] - heights[i][j - 1]),
index(size(heights[0]), i, j - 1),
index(size(heights[0]), i, j));
}
}
}
sort(begin(diffs), end(diffs));
UnionFind union_find(size(heights) * size(heights[0]));
for (const auto& [d, i, j] : diffs) {
if (union_find.union_set(i, j)) {
if (union_find.find_set(index(size(heights[0]), 0, 0)) ==
union_find.find_set(index(size(heights[0]), size(heights) - 1, size(heights[0]) - 1))) {
return d;
}
}
}
return 0;
}
private:
class UnionFind {
public:
UnionFind(const int n)
: set_(n)
, rank_(n)
, count_(n) {
iota(set_.begin(), set_.end(), 0);
}
int find_set(const int x) {
if (set_[x] != x) {
set_[x] = find_set(set_[x]); // Path compression.
}
return set_[x];
}
bool union_set(const int x, const int y) {
int x_root = find_set(x), y_root = find_set(y);
if (x_root == y_root) {
return false;
}
if (rank_[x_root] < rank_[y_root]) { // Union by rank.
set_[x_root] = y_root;
} else if (rank_[x_root] > rank_[y_root]) {
set_[y_root] = x_root;
} else {
set_[y_root] = x_root;
++rank_[x_root];
}
--count_;
return true;
}
int size() const {
return count_;
}
private:
vector<int> set_;
vector<int> rank_;
int count_;
};
int index(int n, int i, int j) {
return i * n + j;
}
};
// Time: O(m * n * logh)
// Space: O(m * n)
// bi-bfs solution
class Solution3 {
public:
int minimumEffortPath(vector<vector<int>>& heights) {
static const int MAX_H = 1e6;
int left = 0, right = MAX_H;
while (left <= right) {
int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
if (check(heights, mid)) {
right = mid - 1;
} else {
left = mid + 1;
}
}
return left;
}
private:
bool check(const vector<vector<int>>& heights, int x) {
static const vector<pair<int, int>> directions{{0, 1}, {1, 0},
{0, -1}, {-1, 0}};
vector<vector<int>> lookup(size(heights), vector<int>(size(heights[0])));
unordered_set<pair<int, int>, PairHash<int>> left({{0, 0}});
unordered_set<pair<int, int>, PairHash<int>> right({{size(heights) - 1, size(heights[0]) - 1}});
while (!empty(left)) {
for (const auto& [r, c] : left) {
lookup[r][c] = true;
}
unordered_set<pair<int, int>, PairHash<int>> new_left;
for (const auto& [r, c] : left) {
if (right.count(pair(r, c))) {
return true;
}
for (const auto& [dr, dc] : directions) {
int nr = r + dr, nc = c + dc;
if (!(0 <= nr && nr < size(heights) &&
0 <= nc && nc < size(heights[0]) &&
abs(heights[nr][nc] - heights[r][c]) <= x &&
!lookup[nr][nc])) {
continue;
}
new_left.emplace(nr, nc);
}
}
left = move(new_left);
if (size(left) > size(right)) {
swap(left, right);
}
}
return false;
}
template <typename T>
struct PairHash {
size_t operator()(const pair<T, T>& p) const {
size_t seed = 0;
seed ^= std::hash<T>{}(p.first) + 0x9e3779b9 + (seed<<6) + (seed>>2);
seed ^= std::hash<T>{}(p.second) + 0x9e3779b9 + (seed<<6) + (seed>>2);
return seed;
}
};
};
// Time: O(m * n * logh)
// Space: O(m * n)
// bfs solution
class Solution4 {
public:
int minimumEffortPath(vector<vector<int>>& heights) {
static const int MAX_H = 1e6;
int left = 0, right = MAX_H;
while (left <= right) {
int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
if (check(heights, mid)) {
right = mid - 1;
} else {
left = mid + 1;
}
}
return left;
}
private:
bool check(const vector<vector<int>>& heights, int x) {
static const vector<pair<int, int>> directions{{0, 1}, {1, 0},
{0, -1}, {-1, 0}};
queue<pair<int, int>> q({{0, 0}});
vector<vector<int>> lookup(size(heights), vector<int>(size(heights[0])));
while (!empty(q)) {
const auto [r, c] = q.front(); q.pop();
if (r == size(heights) - 1 && c == size(heights[0]) - 1) {
return true;
}
for (const auto& [dr, dc] : directions) {
int nr = r + dr, nc = c + dc;
if (!(0 <= nr && nr < size(heights) &&
0 <= nc && nc < size(heights[0]) &&
abs(heights[nr][nc] - heights[r][c]) <= x &&
!lookup[nr][nc])) {
continue;
}
lookup[nr][nc] = true;
q.emplace(nr, nc);
}
}
return false;
}
template <typename T>
struct PairHash {
size_t operator()(const pair<T, T>& p) const {
size_t seed = 0;
seed ^= std::hash<T>{}(p.first) + 0x9e3779b9 + (seed<<6) + (seed>>2);
seed ^= std::hash<T>{}(p.second) + 0x9e3779b9 + (seed<<6) + (seed>>2);
return seed;
}
};
};
// Time: O(m * n * logh)
// Space: O(m * n)
// dfs solution
class Solution5 {
public:
int minimumEffortPath(vector<vector<int>>& heights) {
static const int MAX_H = 1e6;
int left = 0, right = MAX_H;
while (left <= right) {
int mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
if (check(heights, mid)) {
right = mid - 1;
} else {
left = mid + 1;
}
}
return left;
}
private:
bool check(const vector<vector<int>>& heights, int x) {
static const vector<pair<int, int>> directions{{0, 1}, {1, 0},
{0, -1}, {-1, 0}};
vector<pair<int, int>> stk({{0, 0}});
vector<vector<int>> lookup(size(heights), vector<int>(size(heights[0])));
while (!empty(stk)) {
const auto [r, c] = stk.back(); stk.pop_back();
if (r == size(heights) - 1 && c == size(heights[0]) - 1) {
return true;
}
for (const auto& [dr, dc] : directions) {
int nr = r + dr, nc = c + dc;
if (!(0 <= nr && nr < size(heights) &&
0 <= nc && nc < size(heights[0]) &&
abs(heights[nr][nc] - heights[r][c]) <= x &&
!lookup[nr][nc])) {
continue;
}
lookup[nr][nc] = true;
stk.emplace_back(nr, nc);
}
}
return false;
}
template <typename T>
struct PairHash {
size_t operator()(const pair<T, T>& p) const {
size_t seed = 0;
seed ^= std::hash<T>{}(p.first) + 0x9e3779b9 + (seed<<6) + (seed>>2);
seed ^= std::hash<T>{}(p.second) + 0x9e3779b9 + (seed<<6) + (seed>>2);
return seed;
}
};
};
Beginner Explanation
What is Path With Minimum Effort?
Path With Minimum Effort (LeetCode #1631) is a Medium problem that primarily trains graph.
How to think about it
- Restate the goal in your own words before coding.
- Work a tiny example by hand so the invariant becomes obvious.
- Identify the pattern — this problem aligns with binary search, dfs backtracking, queue bfs, union find, and dijkstras algorithm.
- Only then translate the idea into code.
Why this problem matters
It sits in the sweet spot of interview difficulty: multiple valid approaches, clear trade-offs. Official solution notes mention: Binary Search, DFS, BFS, Bi-BFS.
AlgoForge explanations are original teaching notes. Always open the official problem statement on LeetCode for constraints and examples.
Interview Walkthrough
Interview approach for Path With Minimum Effort
Opening (30–60 seconds)
- Clarify inputs/outputs and edge cases (empty input, single element, duplicates, overflow).
- State a brute force so the interviewer knows you can solve it naively.
- Propose the optimal direction tied to binary search, dfs backtracking, queue bfs, union find, and dijkstras algorithm.
Core solution narrative
- Define the state you track (pointers, DP cell, set membership, stack top, etc.).
- Explain the transition when you process the next element.
- Call out time (O(m * n * log(m * n))) and space (O(m * n)) before coding.
- Code cleanly; narrate variable names.
What interviewers listen for
- Correctness on edge cases
- Complexity honesty
- Ability to discuss trade-offs (e.g., hash map space vs. sort + two pointers)
Follow-up questions they may ask
- Can you solve it with less memory?
- What if the input stream is infinite / doesn't fit in RAM?
- How would tests look for adversarial inputs?
Optimized Approach
Optimized solution notes
The reference solutions on AlgoForge target O(m * n * log(m * n)) time and O(m * n) space.
Pattern focus: binary search, dfs backtracking, queue bfs, union find, and dijkstras algorithm
Use the pattern as a checklist:
- binary search — confirm the invariant holds after each step
- dfs backtracking — confirm the invariant holds after each step
- queue bfs — confirm the invariant holds after each step
- union find — confirm the invariant holds after each step
- dijkstras algorithm — confirm the invariant holds after each step
Multiple methods appear in the source solutions — compare them and explain when each is preferable.
Implementation tips
- Prefer readable names over micro-optimizations in interviews.
- Extract helpers only when they clarify (e.g., expand-around-center, DFS visit).
- After AC-level logic, re-scan for off-by-one and null checks.
Complexity Analysis
Complexity
| Measure | Bound |
|---|---|
| Time | O(m * n * log(m * n)) |
| Space | O(m * n) |
How to justify this in an interview
- Time: count loops, map/set operations, and recursive branching; state average vs worst case if relevant.
- Space: include hash maps, recursion stack, and output allocation when the problem asks for it.
If your implementation differs from the reference, re-derive big-O from your code — never memorize a complexity you cannot defend.
Common Mistakes
Common mistakes on Path With Minimum Effort
- Skipping edge cases — empty collections, single-element inputs, max constraints.
- Wrong invariant for binary search, dfs backtracking, queue bfs, union find, and dijkstras algorithm — updating state too early or too late.
- Mutating input unexpectedly when the problem forbids it.
- Off-by-one in windows, ranges, or binary search bounds.
- Ignoring overflow / precision for integer arithmetic problems.
- Overengineering — jumping to an advanced structure when a simpler approach works.
Alternative Approaches
Alternatives
The source file includes more than one method. Compare:
- Primary optimized path — best complexity for typical interviews.
- Secondary approach — often brute force, sorting-based, or space-optimized variant.
Practice articulating when you would pick each (constraints, readability, follow-ups).
Edge Cases
Edge cases checklist
- Minimum input size
- Maximum input size / time limits
- Duplicates and already-sorted input
- Negative numbers / zeros (if applicable)
- Disconnected structures (graphs/trees)
- Single path vs branching recursion depth
Pattern Recognition
Spotting this pattern
Signal phrases that point to binary search, dfs backtracking, queue bfs, union find, and dijkstras algorithm:
- Sorted input or ability to sort without changing the answer class
- Need for contiguous subarray / substring → consider sliding window
- Need for O(1) membership → hash set/map
- Optimal substructure + overlapping subproblems → DP
- Connectivity / components → graph DFS/BFS or Union-Find
Primary topics: graph.
Follow-up Interview Questions
Follow-ups
- How does the solution change if the input is a stream?
- Can you solve it in-place?
- What if duplicates must be handled differently?
- How would you parallelize the approach?
- Design tests that would break a buggy implementation.
Practice Recommendations
What to practice next
- Re-solve Path With Minimum Effort in a second language (cpp, python).
- Drill 3–5 more problems tagged graph.
- Teach the solution out loud in under 5 minutes.
- Add this problem to your revision calendar in 3 days and 14 days.
Visualization
Study checklist
- Read the official problem statement on LeetCode
- Solve on paper / whiteboard first
- Implement the binary search, dfs backtracking, queue bfs, union find, and dijkstras algorithm approach
- Verify edge cases from the checklist
- State time and space complexity aloud
- Compare with the AlgoForge reference solution
- Schedule a revision session
Revision notes
Path With Minimum Effort (#1631) — Medium. Pattern: binary search, dfs backtracking, queue bfs, union find, and dijkstras algorithm. Complexity: O(m * n * log(m * n)) time / O(m * n) space. Re-derive the invariant before coding.
FAQs
What is the time complexity of Path With Minimum Effort?+
The reference solutions aim for O(m * n * log(m * n)) time and O(m * n) space. Always re-derive complexity from the code you write in the interview.
What pattern does Path With Minimum Effort use?+
It primarily maps to binary search, dfs backtracking, queue bfs, union find, and dijkstras algorithm, within the broader topic of graph.
Is Path With Minimum Effort good for interviews?+
Yes — as a Medium problem it is a solid practice target. Pair it with related problems in the same pattern family for spaced repetition.
Where can I read the official statement?+
Open the official LeetCode page for constraints and examples: https://leetcode.com/problems/path-with-minimum-effort/