#3419Medium~35 min

Minimize the Maximum Edge Weight of Graph

Time O(nlogn + e) · Space O(n + e) · Official statement on LeetCode

graph graph dijkstras algorithm prims algorithm binary search queue bfs

Solutions

// Time:  O(nlogn + e)
// Space: O(n + e)

// dijkstra's algorithm
class Solution {
public:
    int minMaxWeight(int n, vector<vector<int>>& edges, int threshold) {
        static const int INF = numeric_limits<int>::max();

        vector<unordered_map<int, int>> adj(n);
        const auto& dijkstra = [&]() {
            vector<int> best(size(adj), INF);
            best[0] = 0;
            priority_queue<pair<int, int>, vector<pair<int, int>>, greater<pair<int, int>>> min_heap;
            min_heap.emplace(0, 0);
            while (!empty(min_heap)) {
                const auto [curr, u] = min_heap.top(); min_heap.pop();
                if (curr != best[u]) {
                    continue;
                }
                for (const auto& [v, w] : adj[u]) {
                    if (!(max(w, curr) < best[v])) {
                        continue;
                    }
                    best[v] = max(w, curr);
                    min_heap.emplace(best[v], v);
                }
            }
            const int result = ranges::max(best);
            return result != INF ? result : -1;
        };

        for (const auto& e : edges) {
            adj[e[1]][e[0]] = adj[e[1]].count(e[0]) ? min(adj[e[1]][e[0]], e[2]) : e[2];
        }
        return dijkstra();
    }
};

// Time:  O(nlogn + e)
// Space: O(n + e)
// prim's algorithm
class Solution2 {
public:
    int minMaxWeight(int n, vector<vector<int>>& edges, int threshold) {
        static const int INF = numeric_limits<int>::max();

        vector<unordered_map<int, int>> adj(n);
        const auto& prim = [&]() {
            vector<int> best(size(adj), INF);
            priority_queue<pair<int, int>, vector<pair<int, int>>, greater<pair<int, int>>> min_heap;
            min_heap.emplace(0, 0);
            while (!empty(min_heap)) {
                const auto [curr, u] = min_heap.top(); min_heap.pop();
                if (best[u] != INF) {
                    continue;
                }
                best[u] = curr;
                for (const auto& [v, w] : adj[u]) {
                    if (best[v] != INF) {
                        continue;
                    }
                    min_heap.emplace(w, v);
                }
            }
            const int result = ranges::max(best);
            return result != INF ? result : -1;
        };

        for (const auto& e : edges) {
            adj[e[1]][e[0]] = adj[e[1]].count(e[0]) ? min(adj[e[1]][e[0]], e[2]) : e[2];
        }
        return prim();
    }
};

// Time:  O(nlogw + e)
// Space: O(n + e)
// binary search, bfs
class Solution3 {
public:
    int minMaxWeight(int n, vector<vector<int>>& edges, int threshold) {
        static const int INF = numeric_limits<int>::max();

        const auto& binary_search = [](auto left, auto right, const auto& check) {
            while (left <= right) {
                const auto mid = left + (right - left) / 2;
                if (check(mid)) {
                    right = mid - 1;
                } else {
                    left = mid + 1;
                }
            }
            return left;
        };

        vector<unordered_map<int, int>> adj(n);
        const auto& check = [&](const auto& x) {
            int cnt = size(adj);
            vector<bool> lookup(size(adj));
            lookup[0] = true;
            --cnt;
            vector<int> q = {0};
            while (!empty(q)) {
                vector<int> new_q;
                for (const auto& u : q) {
                    for (const auto& [v, w] : adj[u]) {
                        if (w > x || lookup[v]) {
                            continue;
                        }
                        lookup[v] = true;
                        --cnt;
                        new_q.emplace_back(v);
                    }
                }
                q = move(new_q);
            }
            return cnt == 0;
        };
    
        for (const auto& e : edges) {
            adj[e[1]][e[0]] = adj[e[1]].count(e[0]) ? min(adj[e[1]][e[0]], e[2]) : e[2];
        }
        const int left = ranges::min(edges, [](const auto& a, const auto& b) { return a[2] < b[2]; })[2];
        const int right = ranges::max(edges, [](const auto& a, const auto& b) { return a[2] < b[2]; })[2];
        const int result = binary_search(left, right, check);
        return result <= right ? result : -1;
    }
};

Beginner Explanation

What is Minimize the Maximum Edge Weight of Graph?

Minimize the Maximum Edge Weight of Graph (LeetCode #3419) is a Medium problem that primarily trains graph.

How to think about it

Restate the goal in your own words before coding.
Work a tiny example by hand so the invariant becomes obvious.
Identify the pattern — this problem aligns with graph, dijkstras algorithm, prims algorithm, binary search, and queue bfs.
Only then translate the idea into code.

Why this problem matters

It sits in the sweet spot of interview difficulty: multiple valid approaches, clear trade-offs. Official solution notes mention: Graph, Dijkstra's Algorithm, Prim's Algorithm, Binary Search.

AlgoForge explanations are original teaching notes. Always open the official problem statement on LeetCode for constraints and examples.

Interview Walkthrough

Interview approach for Minimize the Maximum Edge Weight of Graph

Opening (30–60 seconds)

Clarify inputs/outputs and edge cases (empty input, single element, duplicates, overflow).
State a brute force so the interviewer knows you can solve it naively.
Propose the optimal direction tied to graph, dijkstras algorithm, prims algorithm, binary search, and queue bfs.

Core solution narrative

Define the state you track (pointers, DP cell, set membership, stack top, etc.).
Explain the transition when you process the next element.
Call out time (O(nlogn + e)) and space (O(n + e)) before coding.
Code cleanly; narrate variable names.

What interviewers listen for

Correctness on edge cases
Complexity honesty
Ability to discuss trade-offs (e.g., hash map space vs. sort + two pointers)

Follow-up questions they may ask

Can you solve it with less memory?
What if the input stream is infinite / doesn't fit in RAM?
How would tests look for adversarial inputs?

Optimized Approach

Optimized solution notes

The reference solutions on AlgoForge target O(nlogn + e) time and O(n + e) space.

Pattern focus: graph, dijkstras algorithm, prims algorithm, binary search, and queue bfs

Use the pattern as a checklist:

graph — confirm the invariant holds after each step
dijkstras algorithm — confirm the invariant holds after each step
prims algorithm — confirm the invariant holds after each step
binary search — confirm the invariant holds after each step
queue bfs — confirm the invariant holds after each step

Multiple methods appear in the source solutions — compare them and explain when each is preferable.

Implementation tips

Prefer readable names over micro-optimizations in interviews.
Extract helpers only when they clarify (e.g., expand-around-center, DFS visit).
After AC-level logic, re-scan for off-by-one and null checks.

Complexity Analysis

Complexity

Measure	Bound
Time	O(nlogn + e)
Space	O(n + e)

How to justify this in an interview

Time: count loops, map/set operations, and recursive branching; state average vs worst case if relevant.
Space: include hash maps, recursion stack, and output allocation when the problem asks for it.

If your implementation differs from the reference, re-derive big-O from your code — never memorize a complexity you cannot defend.

Common Mistakes

Common mistakes on Minimize the Maximum Edge Weight of Graph

Skipping edge cases — empty collections, single-element inputs, max constraints.
Wrong invariant for graph, dijkstras algorithm, prims algorithm, binary search, and queue bfs — updating state too early or too late.
Mutating input unexpectedly when the problem forbids it.
Off-by-one in windows, ranges, or binary search bounds.
Ignoring overflow / precision for integer arithmetic problems.
Overengineering — jumping to an advanced structure when a simpler approach works.

Alternative Approaches

Alternatives

The source file includes more than one method. Compare:

Primary optimized path — best complexity for typical interviews.
Secondary approach — often brute force, sorting-based, or space-optimized variant.

Practice articulating when you would pick each (constraints, readability, follow-ups).

Edge Cases

Edge cases checklist

Minimum input size
Maximum input size / time limits
Duplicates and already-sorted input
Negative numbers / zeros (if applicable)
Disconnected structures (graphs/trees)
Single path vs branching recursion depth

Pattern Recognition

Spotting this pattern

Signal phrases that point to graph, dijkstras algorithm, prims algorithm, binary search, and queue bfs:

Sorted input or ability to sort without changing the answer class
Need for contiguous subarray / substring → consider sliding window
Need for O(1) membership → hash set/map
Optimal substructure + overlapping subproblems → DP
Connectivity / components → graph DFS/BFS or Union-Find

Primary topics: graph.

Follow-up Interview Questions

Follow-ups

How does the solution change if the input is a stream?
Can you solve it in-place?
What if duplicates must be handled differently?
How would you parallelize the approach?
Design tests that would break a buggy implementation.

Practice Recommendations

What to practice next

Re-solve Minimize the Maximum Edge Weight of Graph in a second language (cpp, python).
Drill 3–5 more problems tagged graph.
Teach the solution out loud in under 5 minutes.
Add this problem to your revision calendar in 3 days and 14 days.

Visualization

Conceptual diagram for Minimize the Maximum Edge Weight of Graph: show input structure (graph), highlight the moving parts of the graph, dijkstras algorithm, prims algorithm, binary search, and queue bfs approach, and annotate each step with the maintained invariant and complexity.

Study checklist

Read the official problem statement on LeetCode
Solve on paper / whiteboard first
Implement the graph, dijkstras algorithm, prims algorithm, binary search, and queue bfs approach
Verify edge cases from the checklist
State time and space complexity aloud
Compare with the AlgoForge reference solution
Schedule a revision session

Revision notes

Minimize the Maximum Edge Weight of Graph (#3419) — Medium. Pattern: graph, dijkstras algorithm, prims algorithm, binary search, and queue bfs. Complexity: O(nlogn + e) time / O(n + e) space. Re-derive the invariant before coding.

FAQs

What is the time complexity of Minimize the Maximum Edge Weight of Graph?+

The reference solutions aim for O(nlogn + e) time and O(n + e) space. Always re-derive complexity from the code you write in the interview.

What pattern does Minimize the Maximum Edge Weight of Graph use?+

It primarily maps to graph, dijkstras algorithm, prims algorithm, binary search, and queue bfs, within the broader topic of graph.

Is Minimize the Maximum Edge Weight of Graph good for interviews?+

Yes — as a Medium problem it is a solid practice target. Pair it with related problems in the same pattern family for spaced repetition.

Where can I read the official statement?+

Open the official LeetCode page for constraints and examples: https://leetcode.com/problems/minimize-the-maximum-edge-weight-of-graph/

#	Title	Difficulty	Topics
3243	Shortest Distance After Road Addition Queries I	Medium	graph
1631	Path With Minimum Effort	Medium	graph
2662	Minimum Cost of a Path With Special Roads	Medium	graph
3265	Count Almost Equal Pairs I	Medium	graph
3310	Remove Methods From Project	Medium	graph
3341	Find Minimum Time to Reach Last Room I	Medium	graph
3342	Find Minimum Time to Reach Last Room II	Medium	graph
3377	Digit Operations to Make Two Integers Equal	Medium	graph