#3430Hard~50 min

Maximum and Minimum Sums of at Most Size K Subarrays

Time O(n) · Space O(k) · Official statement on LeetCode

two pointers two pointers sliding window

Solutions

// Time:  O(n)
// Space: O(k)

// two pointers, sliding window, mono deque
class Solution {
public:
    long long minMaxSubarraySum(vector<int>& nums, int k) {
        const auto& count = [&](const auto& check) {
            int64_t result = 0, total = 0;
            deque<int> dq;
            for (int right = 0; right < size(nums); ++right) {
                while (!empty(dq) && !check(nums[dq.back()], nums[right])) {
                    const int i  = dq.back(); dq.pop_back();
                    const int64_t cnt = i - (!empty(dq) ? dq.back() + 1 : max(right - k + 1, 0)) + 1;
                    total -= cnt * nums[i];
                }
                const int64_t cnt = right - (!empty(dq) ? dq.back() + 1 : max(right - k + 1, 0)) + 1;
                dq.emplace_back(right);
                total += cnt * nums[right];
                result += total;
                if (right >= k - 1) {
                    total -= nums[dq[0]];
                    if (dq[0] == right - (k - 1)) {
                        dq.pop_front();
                    }
                }
            }
            return result;
        };
    
        return count([](const auto& a, const auto& b) { return a < b; }) + 
               count([](const auto& a, const auto& b) { return a > b; });
    }
};

// Time:  O(n)
// Space: O(k)
// two pointers, sliding window, mono deque
class Solution2 {
public:
    long long minMaxSubarraySum(vector<int>& nums, int k) {
        const auto& count = [&](const auto& check) {
            int64_t result = 0, total = 0;
            deque<pair<int, int>> dq;
            for (int right = 0; right < size(nums); ++right) {
                int left = right;
                for (int i; !empty(dq) && !check(nums[dq.back().first], nums[right]); ) {
                    tie(i, left) = dq.back(); dq.pop_back();
                    total -= static_cast<int64_t>(i - left + 1) * nums[i];
                }
                dq.emplace_back(right, left);
                total += static_cast<int64_t>(right - left + 1) * nums[right];
                result += total;
                if (right - (k - 1) >= 0) {
                    total -= nums[dq[0].first];
                    if (dq[0].first == right - (k - 1)) {
                        dq.pop_front();
                    } else {
                        assert(dq[0].second == right - (k - 1));
                        ++dq[0].second;
                    }
                }
            }
            return result;
        };
    
        return count([](const auto& a, const auto& b) { return a < b; }) + 
               count([](const auto& a, const auto& b) { return a > b; });
    }
};

Beginner Explanation

What is Maximum and Minimum Sums of at Most Size K Subarrays?

Maximum and Minimum Sums of at Most Size K Subarrays (LeetCode #3430) is a Hard problem that primarily trains two pointers.

How to think about it

Restate the goal in your own words before coding.
Work a tiny example by hand so the invariant becomes obvious.
Identify the pattern — this problem aligns with two pointers and sliding window.
Only then translate the idea into code.

Why this problem matters

Hard problems force you to combine patterns and prove complexity carefully — interview gold. Official solution notes mention: Two Pointers, Sliding Window, Mono Deque.

AlgoForge explanations are original teaching notes. Always open the official problem statement on LeetCode for constraints and examples.

Interview Walkthrough

Interview approach for Maximum and Minimum Sums of at Most Size K Subarrays

Opening (30–60 seconds)

Clarify inputs/outputs and edge cases (empty input, single element, duplicates, overflow).
State a brute force so the interviewer knows you can solve it naively.
Propose the optimal direction tied to two pointers and sliding window.

Core solution narrative

Define the state you track (pointers, DP cell, set membership, stack top, etc.).
Explain the transition when you process the next element.
Call out time (O(n)) and space (O(k)) before coding.
Code cleanly; narrate variable names.

What interviewers listen for

Correctness on edge cases
Complexity honesty
Ability to discuss trade-offs (e.g., hash map space vs. sort + two pointers)

Follow-up questions they may ask

Can you solve it with less memory?
What if the input stream is infinite / doesn't fit in RAM?
How would tests look for adversarial inputs?

Optimized Approach

Optimized solution notes

The reference solutions on AlgoForge target O(n) time and O(k) space.

Pattern focus: two pointers and sliding window

Use the pattern as a checklist:

two pointers — confirm the invariant holds after each step
sliding window — confirm the invariant holds after each step

Multiple methods appear in the source solutions — compare them and explain when each is preferable.

Implementation tips

Prefer readable names over micro-optimizations in interviews.
Extract helpers only when they clarify (e.g., expand-around-center, DFS visit).
After AC-level logic, re-scan for off-by-one and null checks.

Complexity Analysis

Complexity

Measure	Bound
Time	O(n)
Space	O(k)

How to justify this in an interview

Time: count loops, map/set operations, and recursive branching; state average vs worst case if relevant.
Space: include hash maps, recursion stack, and output allocation when the problem asks for it.

If your implementation differs from the reference, re-derive big-O from your code — never memorize a complexity you cannot defend.

Common Mistakes

Common mistakes on Maximum and Minimum Sums of at Most Size K Subarrays

Skipping edge cases — empty collections, single-element inputs, max constraints.
Wrong invariant for two pointers and sliding window — updating state too early or too late.
Mutating input unexpectedly when the problem forbids it.
Off-by-one in windows, ranges, or binary search bounds.
Ignoring overflow / precision for integer arithmetic problems.
Overengineering — jumping to an advanced structure when a simpler approach works.

Alternative Approaches

Alternatives

The source file includes more than one method. Compare:

Primary optimized path — best complexity for typical interviews.
Secondary approach — often brute force, sorting-based, or space-optimized variant.

Practice articulating when you would pick each (constraints, readability, follow-ups).

Edge Cases

Edge cases checklist

Minimum input size
Maximum input size / time limits
Duplicates and already-sorted input
Negative numbers / zeros (if applicable)
Disconnected structures (graphs/trees)
Single path vs branching recursion depth

Pattern Recognition

Spotting this pattern

Signal phrases that point to two pointers and sliding window:

Sorted input or ability to sort without changing the answer class
Need for contiguous subarray / substring → consider sliding window
Need for O(1) membership → hash set/map
Optimal substructure + overlapping subproblems → DP
Connectivity / components → graph DFS/BFS or Union-Find

Primary topics: two pointers.

Follow-up Interview Questions

Follow-ups

How does the solution change if the input is a stream?
Can you solve it in-place?
What if duplicates must be handled differently?
How would you parallelize the approach?
Design tests that would break a buggy implementation.

Practice Recommendations

What to practice next

Re-solve Maximum and Minimum Sums of at Most Size K Subarrays in a second language (cpp, python).
Drill 3–5 more problems tagged two pointers.
Teach the solution out loud in under 5 minutes.
Add this problem to your revision calendar in 3 days and 14 days.

Visualization

Conceptual diagram for Maximum and Minimum Sums of at Most Size K Subarrays: show input structure (two pointers), highlight the moving parts of the two pointers and sliding window approach, and annotate each step with the maintained invariant and complexity.

Study checklist

Read the official problem statement on LeetCode
Solve on paper / whiteboard first
Implement the two pointers and sliding window approach
Verify edge cases from the checklist
State time and space complexity aloud
Compare with the AlgoForge reference solution
Schedule a revision session

Revision notes

Maximum and Minimum Sums of at Most Size K Subarrays (#3430) — Hard. Pattern: two pointers and sliding window. Complexity: O(n) time / O(k) space. Re-derive the invariant before coding.

FAQs

What is the time complexity of Maximum and Minimum Sums of at Most Size K Subarrays?+

The reference solutions aim for O(n) time and O(k) space. Always re-derive complexity from the code you write in the interview.

What pattern does Maximum and Minimum Sums of at Most Size K Subarrays use?+

It primarily maps to two pointers and sliding window, within the broader topic of two pointers.

Is Maximum and Minimum Sums of at Most Size K Subarrays good for interviews?+

Yes — as a Hard problem it is a solid practice target. Pair it with related problems in the same pattern family for spaced repetition.

Where can I read the official statement?+

Open the official LeetCode page for constraints and examples: https://leetcode.com/problems/maximum-and-minimum-sums-of-at-most-size-k-subarrays/

#	Title	Difficulty	Topics
992	Subarrays with K Different Integers	Hard	two pointers
1687	Delivering Boxes from Storage to Ports	Hard	two pointers
2009	Minimum Number of Operations to Make Array Continuous	Hard	two pointers
2302	Count Subarrays With Score Less Than K	Hard	two pointers
3298	Count Substrings That Can Be Rearranged to Contain a String II	Hard	two pointers
3329	Count Substrings With K-Frequency Characters II	Hard	two pointers
3420	Count Non-Decreasing Subarrays After K Operations	Hard	two pointers
3859	Count Subarrays With K Distinct Integers	Hard	two pointers