AF
Progress
#3749HardPremium on LC~50 min

Evaluate Valid Expressions

Time O(n) · Space O(n) · Official statement on LeetCode

stackstack
cpppython

Solutions

// Time:  O(n)
// Space: O(n)

// stack
class Solution {
public:
    long long evaluateExpression(string expression) {
        static const unordered_map<string, function<int64_t (int64_t, int64_t)>> LOOKUP = {
            {"add", [](int64_t a, int64_t b) { return a + b; }},
            {"sub", [](int64_t a, int64_t b) { return a - b; }},
            {"mul", [](int64_t a, int64_t b) { return a * b; }},
            {"div", [](int64_t a, int64_t b) { return a / b; }}
        };
    
        static const string SYMBOLS = "(,)";

        string curr;
        vector<string> ops;
        vector<vector<int64_t>> params(1);
        for (const auto& x : expression) {
            if (SYMBOLS.find(x) == string::npos) {
                curr.push_back(x);
                continue;
            }
            if (x == '(') {
                ops.emplace_back(curr);
                curr.clear();
                params.emplace_back();
                continue;
            }
            if (!empty(curr)) {
                params.back().emplace_back(stoll(curr));
                curr.clear();
            }
            if (x != ')') {
                continue;
            }
            const auto op = ops.back(); ops.pop_back();
            const auto param = params.back(); params.pop_back();
            params.back().emplace_back(LOOKUP.at(op)(param[0], param[1]));
        }
        return !empty(params[0]) ? params[0][0] : stoll(curr);
    }
};

Beginner Explanation

What is Evaluate Valid Expressions?

Evaluate Valid Expressions (LeetCode #3749) is a Hard problem that primarily trains stack.

How to think about it

  1. Restate the goal in your own words before coding.
  2. Work a tiny example by hand so the invariant becomes obvious.
  3. Identify the pattern — this problem aligns with stack.
  4. Only then translate the idea into code.

Why this problem matters

Hard problems force you to combine patterns and prove complexity carefully — interview gold. Official solution notes mention: Stack.

AlgoForge explanations are original teaching notes. Always open the official problem statement on LeetCode for constraints and examples.

Interview Walkthrough

Interview approach for Evaluate Valid Expressions

Opening (30–60 seconds)

  • Clarify inputs/outputs and edge cases (empty input, single element, duplicates, overflow).
  • State a brute force so the interviewer knows you can solve it naively.
  • Propose the optimal direction tied to stack.

Core solution narrative

  1. Define the state you track (pointers, DP cell, set membership, stack top, etc.).
  2. Explain the transition when you process the next element.
  3. Call out time (O(n)) and space (O(n)) before coding.
  4. Code cleanly; narrate variable names.

What interviewers listen for

  • Correctness on edge cases
  • Complexity honesty
  • Ability to discuss trade-offs (e.g., hash map space vs. sort + two pointers)

Follow-up questions they may ask

  • Can you solve it with less memory?
  • What if the input stream is infinite / doesn't fit in RAM?
  • How would tests look for adversarial inputs?

Optimized Approach

Optimized solution notes

The reference solutions on AlgoForge target O(n) time and O(n) space.

Pattern focus: stack

Use the pattern as a checklist:

  • stack — confirm the invariant holds after each step

Start from the primary solution, then rewrite from memory to lock it in.

Implementation tips

  • Prefer readable names over micro-optimizations in interviews.
  • Extract helpers only when they clarify (e.g., expand-around-center, DFS visit).
  • After AC-level logic, re-scan for off-by-one and null checks.

Complexity Analysis

Complexity

Measure Bound
Time O(n)
Space O(n)

How to justify this in an interview

  • Time: count loops, map/set operations, and recursive branching; state average vs worst case if relevant.
  • Space: include hash maps, recursion stack, and output allocation when the problem asks for it.

If your implementation differs from the reference, re-derive big-O from your code — never memorize a complexity you cannot defend.

Common Mistakes

Common mistakes on Evaluate Valid Expressions

  1. Skipping edge cases — empty collections, single-element inputs, max constraints.
  2. Wrong invariant for stack — updating state too early or too late.
  3. Mutating input unexpectedly when the problem forbids it.
  4. Off-by-one in windows, ranges, or binary search bounds.
  5. Ignoring overflow / precision for integer arithmetic problems.
  6. Overengineering — jumping to an advanced structure when a simpler approach works.

Alternative Approaches

AI expand later

Alternatives

Placeholder for multi-approach comparison. Future AI content generation can expand:

  • Brute force baseline
  • Optimal stack solution
  • Space-optimized rewrite

Prompt slot: expand alternatives for evaluate-valid-expressions.

Edge Cases

Edge cases checklist

  • Minimum input size
  • Maximum input size / time limits
  • Duplicates and already-sorted input
  • Negative numbers / zeros (if applicable)
  • Disconnected structures (graphs/trees)
  • Single path vs branching recursion depth

Pattern Recognition

Spotting this pattern

Signal phrases that point to stack:

  • Sorted input or ability to sort without changing the answer class
  • Need for contiguous subarray / substring → consider sliding window
  • Need for O(1) membership → hash set/map
  • Optimal substructure + overlapping subproblems → DP
  • Connectivity / components → graph DFS/BFS or Union-Find

Primary topics: stack.

Follow-up Interview Questions

Follow-ups

  1. How does the solution change if the input is a stream?
  2. Can you solve it in-place?
  3. What if duplicates must be handled differently?
  4. How would you parallelize the approach?
  5. Design tests that would break a buggy implementation.

Practice Recommendations

What to practice next

  1. Re-solve Evaluate Valid Expressions in a second language (cpp, python).
  2. Drill 3–5 more problems tagged stack.
  3. Teach the solution out loud in under 5 minutes.
  4. Add this problem to your revision calendar in 3 days and 14 days.

Visualization

Conceptual diagram for Evaluate Valid Expressions: show input structure (stack), highlight the moving parts of the stack approach, and annotate each step with the maintained invariant and complexity.

Study checklist

  • Read the official problem statement on LeetCode
  • Solve on paper / whiteboard first
  • Implement the stack approach
  • Verify edge cases from the checklist
  • State time and space complexity aloud
  • Compare with the AlgoForge reference solution
  • Schedule a revision session

Revision notes

Evaluate Valid Expressions (#3749) — Hard. Pattern: stack. Complexity: O(n) time / O(n) space. Re-derive the invariant before coding.

FAQs

What is the time complexity of Evaluate Valid Expressions?+

The reference solutions aim for O(n) time and O(n) space. Always re-derive complexity from the code you write in the interview.

What pattern does Evaluate Valid Expressions use?+

It primarily maps to stack, within the broader topic of stack.

Is Evaluate Valid Expressions good for interviews?+

Yes — as a Hard problem it is a solid practice target. Pair it with related problems in the same pattern family for spaced repetition.

Where can I read the official statement?+

Open the official LeetCode page for constraints and examples: https://leetcode.com/problems/evaluate-valid-expressions/