#3391MediumPremium on LC~35 min

Design a 3D Binary Matrix with Efficient Layer Tracking

Time ctor: O(1) setCell: O(logn) unsetCell: O(logn) largestMatrix: O(logn) · Space O(n^3) · Official statement on LeetCode

design heap sorted list

cpp python

Solutions

// Time:  ctor:          O(1)
//        setCell:       O(logn)
//        unsetCell:     O(logn)
//        largestMatrix: O(logn)
// Space: O(n^3)

// bst
class Matrix3D {
private:
    int n_;
    unordered_map<int, unordered_map<int, unordered_set<int>>> matrix_;
    unordered_map<int, int> cnt_;
    map<int, set<int>> bst_;

public:
    Matrix3D(int n) : n_(n) {
        bst_[0].emplace(n - 1);
    }
    
    void setCell(int x, int y, int z) {
        if (matrix_[x][y].count(z)) {
            return;
        }
        matrix_[x][y].emplace(z);
        if (cnt_[x] || x == n_ - 1) {
            bst_[cnt_[x]].erase(x);
            if (empty(bst_[cnt_[x]])) {
                bst_.erase(cnt_[x]);
            }
        }
        ++cnt_[x];
        bst_[cnt_[x]].emplace(x);
    }
    
    void unsetCell(int x, int y, int z) {
        if (!matrix_.count(x) || !matrix_[x].count(y) || !matrix_[x][y].count(z)) {
            return;
        }
        matrix_[x][y].erase(z);
        if (empty(matrix_[x][y])) {
            matrix_[x].erase(y);
            if (empty(matrix_[x])) {
                matrix_.erase(x);
            }
        }
        bst_[cnt_[x]].erase(x);
        if (empty(bst_[cnt_[x]])) {
            bst_.erase(cnt_[x]);
        }
        --cnt_[x];
        if (cnt_[x] || x == n_ - 1) {
            bst_[cnt_[x]].emplace(x);
        }
    }
    
    int largestMatrix() {
        return *rbegin(rbegin(bst_)->second);
    }
};

// Time:  ctor:          O(1)
//        setCell:       O(logn)
//        unsetCell:     O(logn)
//        largestMatrix: O(logn) on average
// Space: O(n^3)
// heap
class Matrix3D_2 {
private:
    unordered_map<int, unordered_map<int, unordered_set<int>>> matrix_;
    unordered_map<int, int> cnt_;
    priority_queue<pair<int, int>> max_heap_;

public:
    Matrix3D_2(int n) {
        max_heap_.emplace(cnt_[n - 1], n - 1);
    }
    
    void setCell(int x, int y, int z) {
        if (matrix_[x][y].count(z)) {
            return;
        }
        matrix_[x][y].emplace(z);
        ++cnt_[x];
        max_heap_.emplace(cnt_[x], x);
    }
    
    void unsetCell(int x, int y, int z) {
        if (!matrix_.count(x) || !matrix_[x].count(y) || !matrix_[x][y].count(z)) {
            return;
        }
        matrix_[x][y].erase(z);
        if (empty(matrix_[x][y])) {
            matrix_[x].erase(y);
            if (empty(matrix_[x])) {
                matrix_.erase(x);
            }
        }
        --cnt_[x];
        max_heap_.emplace(cnt_[x], x);
    }
    
    int largestMatrix() {
        while (!empty(max_heap_) && max_heap_.top().first != cnt_[max_heap_.top().second]) {
            max_heap_.pop();
        }
        return max_heap_.top().second;
    }
};

Beginner Explanation

What is Design a 3D Binary Matrix with Efficient Layer Tracking?

Design a 3D Binary Matrix with Efficient Layer Tracking (LeetCode #3391) is a Medium problem that primarily trains design.

How to think about it

Restate the goal in your own words before coding.
Work a tiny example by hand so the invariant becomes obvious.
Identify the pattern — this problem aligns with heap and sorted list.
Only then translate the idea into code.

Why this problem matters

It sits in the sweet spot of interview difficulty: multiple valid approaches, clear trade-offs. Official solution notes mention: Heap, Sorted List.

AlgoForge explanations are original teaching notes. Always open the official problem statement on LeetCode for constraints and examples.

Interview Walkthrough

Interview approach for Design a 3D Binary Matrix with Efficient Layer Tracking

Opening (30–60 seconds)

Clarify inputs/outputs and edge cases (empty input, single element, duplicates, overflow).
State a brute force so the interviewer knows you can solve it naively.
Propose the optimal direction tied to heap and sorted list.

Core solution narrative

Define the state you track (pointers, DP cell, set membership, stack top, etc.).
Explain the transition when you process the next element.
Call out time (ctor: O(1) setCell: O(logn) unsetCell: O(logn) largestMatrix: O(logn)) and space (O(n^3)) before coding.
Code cleanly; narrate variable names.

What interviewers listen for

Correctness on edge cases
Complexity honesty
Ability to discuss trade-offs (e.g., hash map space vs. sort + two pointers)

Follow-up questions they may ask

Can you solve it with less memory?
What if the input stream is infinite / doesn't fit in RAM?
How would tests look for adversarial inputs?

Optimized Approach

Optimized solution notes

The reference solutions on AlgoForge target ctor: O(1) setCell: O(logn) unsetCell: O(logn) largestMatrix: O(logn) time and O(n^3) space.

Pattern focus: heap and sorted list

Use the pattern as a checklist:

heap — confirm the invariant holds after each step
sorted list — confirm the invariant holds after each step

Multiple methods appear in the source solutions — compare them and explain when each is preferable.

Implementation tips

Prefer readable names over micro-optimizations in interviews.
Extract helpers only when they clarify (e.g., expand-around-center, DFS visit).
After AC-level logic, re-scan for off-by-one and null checks.

Complexity Analysis

Complexity

Measure	Bound
Time	ctor: O(1) setCell: O(logn) unsetCell: O(logn) largestMatrix: O(logn)
Space	O(n^3)

How to justify this in an interview

Time: count loops, map/set operations, and recursive branching; state average vs worst case if relevant.
Space: include hash maps, recursion stack, and output allocation when the problem asks for it.

If your implementation differs from the reference, re-derive big-O from your code — never memorize a complexity you cannot defend.

Common Mistakes

Common mistakes on Design a 3D Binary Matrix with Efficient Layer Tracking

Skipping edge cases — empty collections, single-element inputs, max constraints.
Wrong invariant for heap and sorted list — updating state too early or too late.
Mutating input unexpectedly when the problem forbids it.
Off-by-one in windows, ranges, or binary search bounds.
Ignoring overflow / precision for integer arithmetic problems.
Overengineering — jumping to an advanced structure when a simpler approach works.

Alternative Approaches

Alternatives

The source file includes more than one method. Compare:

Primary optimized path — best complexity for typical interviews.
Secondary approach — often brute force, sorting-based, or space-optimized variant.

Practice articulating when you would pick each (constraints, readability, follow-ups).

Edge Cases

Edge cases checklist

Minimum input size
Maximum input size / time limits
Duplicates and already-sorted input
Negative numbers / zeros (if applicable)
Disconnected structures (graphs/trees)
Single path vs branching recursion depth

Pattern Recognition

Spotting this pattern

Signal phrases that point to heap and sorted list:

Sorted input or ability to sort without changing the answer class
Need for contiguous subarray / substring → consider sliding window
Need for O(1) membership → hash set/map
Optimal substructure + overlapping subproblems → DP
Connectivity / components → graph DFS/BFS or Union-Find

Primary topics: design.

Follow-up Interview Questions

Follow-ups

How does the solution change if the input is a stream?
Can you solve it in-place?
What if duplicates must be handled differently?
How would you parallelize the approach?
Design tests that would break a buggy implementation.

Practice Recommendations

What to practice next

Re-solve Design a 3D Binary Matrix with Efficient Layer Tracking in a second language (cpp, python).
Drill 3–5 more problems tagged design.
Teach the solution out loud in under 5 minutes.
Add this problem to your revision calendar in 3 days and 14 days.

Visualization

Conceptual diagram for Design a 3D Binary Matrix with Efficient Layer Tracking: show input structure (design), highlight the moving parts of the heap and sorted list approach, and annotate each step with the maintained invariant and complexity.

Study checklist

Read the official problem statement on LeetCode
Solve on paper / whiteboard first
Implement the heap and sorted list approach
Verify edge cases from the checklist
State time and space complexity aloud
Compare with the AlgoForge reference solution
Schedule a revision session

Revision notes

Design a 3D Binary Matrix with Efficient Layer Tracking (#3391) — Medium. Pattern: heap and sorted list. Complexity: ctor: O(1) setCell: O(logn) unsetCell: O(logn) largestMatrix: O(logn) time / O(n^3) space. Re-derive the invariant before coding.

FAQs

What is the time complexity of Design a 3D Binary Matrix with Efficient Layer Tracking?+

The reference solutions aim for ctor: O(1) setCell: O(logn) unsetCell: O(logn) largestMatrix: O(logn) time and O(n^3) space. Always re-derive complexity from the code you write in the interview.

What pattern does Design a 3D Binary Matrix with Efficient Layer Tracking use?+

It primarily maps to heap and sorted list, within the broader topic of design.

Is Design a 3D Binary Matrix with Efficient Layer Tracking good for interviews?+

Yes — as a Medium problem it is a solid practice target. Pair it with related problems in the same pattern family for spaced repetition.

Where can I read the official statement?+

Open the official LeetCode page for constraints and examples: https://leetcode.com/problems/design-a-3d-binary-matrix-with-efficient-layer-tracking/

#	Title	Difficulty	Topics
2034	Stock Price Fluctuation	Medium	design
3815	Design Auction System	Medium	design
3885	Design Event Manager	Medium	design
355	Design Twitter	Medium	design
1845	Seat Reservation Manager	Medium	design
2336	Smallest Number in Infinite Set	Medium	design
2349	Design a Number Container System	Medium	design
2353	Design a Food Rating System	Medium	design