#2818Hard~50 min

Apply Operations to Maximize Score

Time O(sqrt(r) + n * (logr + sqrt(r)/log(sqrt(r))) + klogn) · Space O(sqrt(r) + n) · Official statement on LeetCode

binary heap stack greedy sort heap

cpp python

Solutions

// Time:  O(sqrt(r) + n * (logr + pi(sqrt(r))) + klogn) = O(sqrt(r) + n * (logr + sqrt(r)/log(sqrt(r))) + klogn), m is max(k for _, k in queries), pi(n) = number of primes in a range [1, n] = O(n/logn) by prime number theorem, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_number_theorem
// Space: O(sqrt(r) + n)

// number theory, mono stack, greedy, sort, heap
class Solution {
public:
    int maximumScore(vector<int>& nums, int k) {
        static const int MOD = 1e9 + 7;
        const auto& addmod = [&](uint32_t a, uint32_t b) {  // avoid overflow
            a %= MOD, b %= MOD;
            if (MOD - a <= b) {
                b -= MOD;  // relied on unsigned integer overflow in order to give the expected results
            }
            return a + b;
        };

        const auto& mulmod = [&](uint32_t a, uint32_t b)  {  // avoid overflow
            a %= MOD, b %= MOD;
            uint32_t result = 0;
            if (a < b) {
                swap(a, b);
            }
            while (b > 0)  { 
                if (b % 2 == 1) {
                    result = addmod(result, a);
                }
                a = addmod(a, a);
                b /= 2; 
            } 
            return result; 
        };

        const auto& powmod = [&](uint32_t a, uint32_t b) {
            a %= MOD;
            uint32_t result = 1;
            while (b) {
                if (b & 1) {
                    result = mulmod(result, a);
                }
                a = mulmod(a, a);
                b >>= 1;
            }
            return result;
        };
    
        const auto& linear_sieve_of_eratosthenes = [](int n) {  // Time: O(n), Space: O(n)
            vector<int> spf(n + 1, -1);
            vector<int> primes;
            for (int i = 2; i <= n; ++i) {
                if (spf[i] == -1) {
                    spf[i] = i;
                    primes.emplace_back(i);
                }
                for (const auto& p : primes) {
                    if (i * p > n || p > spf[i]) {
                        break;
                    }
                    spf[i * p] = p;
                }
            }
            return primes;
        };
    
        const auto& primes = linear_sieve_of_eratosthenes(sqrt(*max_element(cbegin(nums), cend(nums))));
        unordered_map<int, int> lookup;
        const auto& count_of_distinct_prime_factors = [&](int x) {
            const int y = x;
            if (!lookup.count(y)) {
                int cnt = 0;
                for (const auto& p : primes) {
                    if (p * p > x) {
                        break;
                    }
                    if (x % p != 0) {
                        continue;
                    }
                    ++cnt;
                    for (; x % p == 0; x /= p);
                }
                if (x != 1) {
                    ++cnt;
                }
                lookup[y] = cnt;
            }
            return lookup[y];
        };

        vector<int> scores;
        scores.reserve(size(nums));
        for (const auto& x : nums) {
            scores.emplace_back(count_of_distinct_prime_factors(x));
        }

        vector<int> stk = {-1};
        vector<int> left(size(scores), -1);
        for (int i = 0; i < size(scores); ++i) {
            while (stk.back() != -1 && scores[stk.back()] < scores[i]) {  // if multiple such elements exist, choose the one with the smallest index
                stk.pop_back();
            }
            left[i] = stk.back();
            stk.emplace_back(i);
        }
        stk = {static_cast<int>(size(scores))};
        vector<int> right(size(scores), -1);
        for (int i =  size(scores) - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
            while (stk.back() != size(scores) && scores[stk.back()] <= scores[i]) {
                stk.pop_back();
            }
            right[i] = stk.back();
            stk.emplace_back(i);
        }

        int result = 1;
        vector<pair<int, int>> pairs;
        pairs.reserve(size(nums));
        for (int i = 0; i < size(nums); ++i) {
            pairs.emplace_back(nums[i], i);
        }
        priority_queue<pair<int, int>> max_heap(cbegin(pairs), cend(pairs));
        while (!empty(max_heap)) {
            const auto [_, i] = max_heap.top(); max_heap.pop();
            const int c = min((i - left[i]) * (right[i] - i), k);
            result = mulmod(result, powmod(nums[i], c));
            k -= c;
            if (!k) {
                break;
            }
        }
        return result;
    }
};

Beginner Explanation

What is Apply Operations to Maximize Score?

Apply Operations to Maximize Score (LeetCode #2818) is a Hard problem that primarily trains binary heap.

How to think about it

Restate the goal in your own words before coding.
Work a tiny example by hand so the invariant becomes obvious.
Identify the pattern — this problem aligns with stack, greedy, sort, and heap.
Only then translate the idea into code.

Why this problem matters

Hard problems force you to combine patterns and prove complexity carefully — interview gold. Official solution notes mention: Number Theory, Linear Sieve of Eratosthenes, Mono Stack, Greedy.

AlgoForge explanations are original teaching notes. Always open the official problem statement on LeetCode for constraints and examples.

Interview Walkthrough

Interview approach for Apply Operations to Maximize Score

Opening (30–60 seconds)

Clarify inputs/outputs and edge cases (empty input, single element, duplicates, overflow).
State a brute force so the interviewer knows you can solve it naively.
Propose the optimal direction tied to stack, greedy, sort, and heap.

Core solution narrative

Define the state you track (pointers, DP cell, set membership, stack top, etc.).
Explain the transition when you process the next element.
Call out time (O(sqrt(r) + n * (logr + sqrt(r)/log(sqrt(r))) + klogn)) and space (O(sqrt(r) + n)) before coding.
Code cleanly; narrate variable names.

What interviewers listen for

Correctness on edge cases
Complexity honesty
Ability to discuss trade-offs (e.g., hash map space vs. sort + two pointers)

Follow-up questions they may ask

Can you solve it with less memory?
What if the input stream is infinite / doesn't fit in RAM?
How would tests look for adversarial inputs?

Optimized Approach

Optimized solution notes

The reference solutions on AlgoForge target O(sqrt(r) + n * (logr + sqrt(r)/log(sqrt(r))) + klogn) time and O(sqrt(r) + n) space.

Pattern focus: stack, greedy, sort, and heap

Use the pattern as a checklist:

stack — confirm the invariant holds after each step
greedy — confirm the invariant holds after each step
sort — confirm the invariant holds after each step
heap — confirm the invariant holds after each step

Multiple methods appear in the source solutions — compare them and explain when each is preferable.

Implementation tips

Prefer readable names over micro-optimizations in interviews.
Extract helpers only when they clarify (e.g., expand-around-center, DFS visit).
After AC-level logic, re-scan for off-by-one and null checks.

Complexity Analysis

Complexity

Measure	Bound
Time	*O(sqrt(r) + n (logr + sqrt(r)/log(sqrt(r))) + klogn)**
Space	O(sqrt(r) + n)

How to justify this in an interview

Time: count loops, map/set operations, and recursive branching; state average vs worst case if relevant.
Space: include hash maps, recursion stack, and output allocation when the problem asks for it.

If your implementation differs from the reference, re-derive big-O from your code — never memorize a complexity you cannot defend.

Common Mistakes

Common mistakes on Apply Operations to Maximize Score

Skipping edge cases — empty collections, single-element inputs, max constraints.
Wrong invariant for stack, greedy, sort, and heap — updating state too early or too late.
Mutating input unexpectedly when the problem forbids it.
Off-by-one in windows, ranges, or binary search bounds.
Ignoring overflow / precision for integer arithmetic problems.
Overengineering — jumping to an advanced structure when a simpler approach works.

Alternative Approaches

Alternatives

The source file includes more than one method. Compare:

Primary optimized path — best complexity for typical interviews.
Secondary approach — often brute force, sorting-based, or space-optimized variant.

Practice articulating when you would pick each (constraints, readability, follow-ups).

Edge Cases

Edge cases checklist

Minimum input size
Maximum input size / time limits
Duplicates and already-sorted input
Negative numbers / zeros (if applicable)
Disconnected structures (graphs/trees)
Single path vs branching recursion depth

Pattern Recognition

Spotting this pattern

Signal phrases that point to stack, greedy, sort, and heap:

Sorted input or ability to sort without changing the answer class
Need for contiguous subarray / substring → consider sliding window
Need for O(1) membership → hash set/map
Optimal substructure + overlapping subproblems → DP
Connectivity / components → graph DFS/BFS or Union-Find

Primary topics: binary heap.

Follow-up Interview Questions

Follow-ups

How does the solution change if the input is a stream?
Can you solve it in-place?
What if duplicates must be handled differently?
How would you parallelize the approach?
Design tests that would break a buggy implementation.

Practice Recommendations

What to practice next

Re-solve Apply Operations to Maximize Score in a second language (cpp, python).
Drill 3–5 more problems tagged binary heap.
Teach the solution out loud in under 5 minutes.
Add this problem to your revision calendar in 3 days and 14 days.

Visualization

Conceptual diagram for Apply Operations to Maximize Score: show input structure (binary heap), highlight the moving parts of the stack, greedy, sort, and heap approach, and annotate each step with the maintained invariant and complexity.

Study checklist

Read the official problem statement on LeetCode
Solve on paper / whiteboard first
Implement the stack, greedy, sort, and heap approach
Verify edge cases from the checklist
State time and space complexity aloud
Compare with the AlgoForge reference solution
Schedule a revision session

Revision notes

Apply Operations to Maximize Score (#2818) — Hard. Pattern: stack, greedy, sort, and heap. Complexity: O(sqrt(r) + n * (logr + sqrt(r)/log(sqrt(r))) + klogn) time / O(sqrt(r) + n) space. Re-derive the invariant before coding.

FAQs

What is the time complexity of Apply Operations to Maximize Score?+

The reference solutions aim for O(sqrt(r) + n * (logr + sqrt(r)/log(sqrt(r))) + klogn) time and O(sqrt(r) + n) space. Always re-derive complexity from the code you write in the interview.

What pattern does Apply Operations to Maximize Score use?+

It primarily maps to stack, greedy, sort, and heap, within the broader topic of binary heap.

Is Apply Operations to Maximize Score good for interviews?+

Yes — as a Hard problem it is a solid practice target. Pair it with related problems in the same pattern family for spaced repetition.

Where can I read the official statement?+

Open the official LeetCode page for constraints and examples: https://leetcode.com/problems/apply-operations-to-maximize-score/

#	Title	Difficulty	Topics
358	Rearrange String k Distance Apart	Hard	binary heap
3684	Maximize Sum of At Most K Distinct Elements	Easy	binary heap
3691	Maximum Total Subarray Value II	Hard	binary heap
295	Find Median from Data Stream	Hard	binary heap
407	Trapping Rain Water II	Hard	binary heap
480	Sliding Window Median	Hard	binary heap
502	IPO	Hard	binary heap
632	Smallest Range	Hard	binary heap